I'm So Damn Tired of Not Being a Person

The message from the 9th Circuit Court is loud and clear: women still aren't persons under the law.

The full 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has not yet ruled on the merits of the case, but the message is loud and clear: Women still aren't considered persons under the law.

📽 Video language warning: The below video contains cuss words (that I don't even normally use). Here, I'm raw. I'm angry. I'm downhearted. Because I'm just so damn tired of women not counting as full persons under the law. And you should be angry too!

Remember when Idaho argued in a court of law pregnant women facing limb amputations from septic shock can’t get emergency abortions healthcare? Well, Idaho still hasn't changed it's tune.

Idaho thinks it has a legal right to maim you. And the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is playing along.

This effects all of us—both inside and outside of the potato-growing Maim You State.

Last month, an Idaho court ruled that women who are pregnant have a constitutional right to self-preservation when their health is seriously jeopardized by a previability pregnancy. In other words, the State doesn't have a right to maim you and push you to deaths door just because they like the person inside you more than they like you.

For Idaho, however, the very thought that pregnant women might finally receive an abortion when never to avoid limb amputations or septic shock was intolerable. So, the state appealed.

In response, the Idaho lower court narrowed its decision to cover one single doctor and his patients. But even that was too intolerable to the potato-growing Maim You State.

Today, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals paused the lower court's ruling until the full Court can hear the case, even though it had narrowed to a single doctor — Dr. Stacey Seyb, a maternal fetal medicine specialist who care for patients with dangerous and high-risk pregnancies.

That means Idaho gets to keep demanding women's limbs as a sacrifice to their fetus fetish. That means Idaho gets to keep pushing women to the verge of death. ‘Cause that's Idaho's kink.

All because the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, based in the free state of California, thinks Idaho will suffer harm if the lower court's ruling is left in place until the full trial. As for the women pushed into kidney failure or respiratory arrest, well that's not real harm.

Only human persons can be harmed by sadistic abortion bans, and sadly, women still aren't persons under the law.